<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: JRuby and why it might be nice to be back on the JVM &#8211; Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.hungrymachine.com/2008/11/21/jruby-and-why-it-might-be-nice-to-be-back-on-the-jvm-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.hungrymachine.com/2008/11/21/jruby-and-why-it-might-be-nice-to-be-back-on-the-jvm-part-2/</link>
	<description>The guys behind LivingSocial</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 05:04:00 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dirkjan Bussink</title>
		<link>http://blog.hungrymachine.com/2008/11/21/jruby-and-why-it-might-be-nice-to-be-back-on-the-jvm-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>Dirkjan Bussink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 02:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">blog.hungrymachine.com/2008/11/21/jruby-and-why-it-might-be-nice-to-be-back-on-the-jvm-part-2#comment-184</guid>
		<description>You might be interested to know that the JRuby people consider it a bug if they are slower on something than MRI. If you have some more information on why it&#039;s slower, I&#039;m sure they&#039;re interested in fixing this.

Which version did you use to test? I know the latest trunk is already quite a bit faster again than the last released 1.1.5 version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might be interested to know that the JRuby people consider it a bug if they are slower on something than MRI. If you have some more information on why it&#8217;s slower, I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;re interested in fixing this.</p>
<p>Which version did you use to test? I know the latest trunk is already quite a bit faster again than the last released 1.1.5 version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
